Skip to content
statance
MenuClose
unknown

CVE-2026-99272

smb: client: validate the data area in SMB2_read()

Published 7 Nov 2026 · Source updated 7 Nov 2026 · Retrieved 2026-11-11 01:50 UTC

Monitor this CVE ↗Full CVE monitoring on Pro and Business

What happened?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smb: client: validate the data area in SMB2_read()

SMB2_read() copies le32_to_cpu(rsp->DataLength) bytes from (char *)rsp + rsp->DataOffset without checking that the range lies within the response actually received. A READ response with DataOffset == 0 makes smb2_get_data_area_len() zero the data length, so smb2_check_message() accepts a frame as short as the fixed response, while SMB2_read() still uses the server-supplied DataLength, capped only by CIFS_MAX_MSGSIZE and the caller's length.

A malicious server can answer the synchronous read used by the mfsymlinks (or SFU) symlink parser with an 81-byte READ response carrying DataOffset 0 and DataLength 1067, making the client copy 1067 bytes from a 448-byte receive object (KASAN slab-out-of-bounds; up to 16 KiB in the general case).

Clamp a zero (or header-overlapping) DataOffset to read_rsp_size, as handle_read_data() does for the asynchronous path, and reject the response unless DataOffset + DataLength fits within rsp_iov.iov_len. The SMB1 helper was fixed the same way in 5be5bdda5863.

Description supplied by CVE Program. Formatting is simplified; follow the original advisory for full details.

Affected software and versions

Source-provided software and version information
SoftwareVersion informationFixed version
LinuxLinuxaffected: d8e050398d23ef7c019c96200b80d73f4e5cec0c to < 1ba1937de005e261a8858f45bfef5da7458df94c; affected: d8e050398d23ef7c019c96200b80d73f4e5cec0c to < 2ec9cdf469dd32bcf33073aeb30c08e9356e0ca1See vendor advisory
LinuxLinuxaffected: 3.7; unaffected: 0 to < 3.7; unaffected: 7.3.2 to ≤ 7.3.*; unaffected: 7.4-rc1 to ≤ *See vendor advisory

Version information comes from the source record and can include unaffected products and exceptions. Distribution packages may contain backported fixes: an older upstream version alone does not prove a server is affected.

Is it being exploited?

This CVE was not listed in the CISA catalogue at our last retrieval. This does not establish that exploitation is absent.

CISA data retrieved 2026-11-11 09:43 UTC. Check CISA ↗

How to respond

  1. Confirm the product, installed package version, and any configuration requirements in the vendor advisory.
  2. Follow the vendor’s remediation or workaround guidance in the references below. Structured fixed-version data is unavailable here; the publisher’s description may include a fix or workaround.
  3. Restart affected services if required, then verify the running version. Known exploitation may warrant investigation as well as patching.

Sources and remediation references

This public advisory does not determine whether a particular server is affected. Records are refreshed as sources change; verify urgent decisions against the original advisory.

← Browse the public CVE feed