Skip to content
statance
MenuClose
unknown

CVE-2026-99229

io_uring/wait: don't spin on a stuck overflow list

Published 2 Nov 2026 · Source updated 3 Nov 2026 · Retrieved 2026-11-05 12:07 UTC

Monitor this CVE ↗Full CVE monitoring on Pro and Business

What happened?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

io_uring/wait: don't spin on a stuck overflow list

As long as IO_CHECK_CQ_OVERFLOW_BIT is set, io_cqring_wait_schedule() returns right away, before it gets to look at signals or arms the timeout, for io_cqring_wait() to flush the overflow list. If that doesn't empty the list, and the CQ ring doesn't hold the number of events the caller wants, the loop starts over, with the same result. The task spins in the kernel, and can't be killed.

The assumption is that this can't happen: if CQEs can't be flushed, the ring is full, and min_events is capped to the size of the ring. But:

- With IORING_SETUP_CQE_MIXED a 32b CQE needs two contiguous entries. It is stuck on the list if a single one is free, and then the ring holds less than cq_entries events. A single threaded application that asks for as many events as the ring has entries never gets out of io_uring_enter().

- Whether the ring is full is up to the CQ head, which the application can write to. While one thread waits for events on an empty ring, another one can move the head back so that the ring looks full and have a CQE overflow. The waiter can't be stopped any more, not even by SIGKILL.

Only the application can make room in the CQ ring. Return to it if the list could not be flushed.

Description supplied by CVE Program. Formatting is simplified; follow the original advisory for full details.

Affected software and versions

Source-provided software and version information
SoftwareVersion informationFixed version
LinuxLinuxaffected: 3fcf19d592d5cb63eb209400b22055651e3c27d0 to < bf1d2ed84b3162e3b0e0bb7018ac59147da6e975; affected: 3fcf19d592d5cb63eb209400b22055651e3c27d0 to < a6cfc85c6bf9498aaf1978b503f9663635a1aa22; affected: 3fcf19d592d5cb63eb209400b22055651e3c27d0 to < 4a89352edd8b3e20d1e1fb33f0fc297dd137149f; affected: 3fcf19d592d5cb63eb209400b22055651e3c27d0 to < c347691e5dc5481b2d6943c123619e04847fb0dc; affected: 3fcf19d592d5cb63eb209400b22055651e3c27d0 to < 34f5a664c34d3cb62f6bec7f4156754594a7d25bSee vendor advisory
LinuxLinuxaffected: 6.3; unaffected: 0 to < 6.3; unaffected: 6.6.161 to ≤ 6.6.*; unaffected: 6.12.115 to ≤ 6.12.*; unaffected: 6.18.60 to ≤ 6.18.*; unaffected: 7.2.14 to ≤ 7.2.*; unaffected: 7.4-rc1 to ≤ *See vendor advisory

Version information comes from the source record and can include unaffected products and exceptions. Distribution packages may contain backported fixes: an older upstream version alone does not prove a server is affected.

Is it being exploited?

This CVE was not listed in the CISA catalogue at our last retrieval. This does not establish that exploitation is absent.

CISA data retrieved 2026-11-06 16:38 UTC. Check CISA ↗

How to respond

  1. Confirm the product, installed package version, and any configuration requirements in the vendor advisory.
  2. Follow the vendor’s remediation or workaround guidance in the references below. Structured fixed-version data is unavailable here; the publisher’s description may include a fix or workaround.
  3. Restart affected services if required, then verify the running version. Known exploitation may warrant investigation as well as patching.

Sources and remediation references

This public advisory does not determine whether a particular server is affected. Records are refreshed as sources change; verify urgent decisions against the original advisory.

← Browse the public CVE feed