Skip to content
statance
MenuClose
medium · CVSS 5.9

CVE-2026-65628

Infinite recursion (CPU denial-of-service) in JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2 on mismatched key types

Published 26 Oct 2026 · Source updated 2 Nov 2026 · Retrieved 2026-11-06 14:41 UTC

Statance checks for CVE-2026-65628. Connected servers are checked automatically against the fixed versions their distribution or package ecosystem has published for it, including app dependency lockfiles. Check my servers ↗
Monitor this CVE ↗Full CVE monitoring on Pro and Business

What happened?

jose_jwk:shared_secret/2 (exposed in Elixir as JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2) derives an ECDH shared secret from two JWKs. Its first function clause only matches when both JWKs carry the same key type (kty) module, and its fallback clause re-invokes itself as shared_secret(from(YourJWK), from(MyJWK)). Because from/1 returns an already-parsed jose_jwk record unchanged, passing two JWKs whose key types differ (for example an EC key and an RSA key) makes the fallback clause re-enter with identical arguments, producing an unbounded tail-recursive loop that never returns and never crashes.

An application that derives a shared secret from an externally supplied peer public key without first checking that the peer key's type and curve match its own key can be driven into this loop by an attacker-controlled JWK, pinning an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU. Repeated requests exhaust the available schedulers, resulting in a denial of service.

This issue affects jose: from 1.5.0 before 1.11.13.

Description supplied by CVE Program. Formatting is simplified; follow the original advisory for full details.

Affected software and versions

Source-provided software and version information
SoftwareVersion informationFixed version
josepotatosaladaffected: 1.5.0 to < 1.11.13See vendor advisory
potatosalad/erlang-josepotatosaladaffected: 7b80b9f55b9898e1a6901ce136061b241b021d7c to < 26182a7de63b91550035d3f08741f7d17f1f675aSee vendor advisory

Version information comes from the source record and can include unaffected products and exceptions. Distribution packages may contain backported fixes: an older upstream version alone does not prove a server is affected.

Is it being exploited?

This CVE was not listed in the CISA catalogue at our last retrieval. This does not establish that exploitation is absent.

CISA data retrieved 2026-11-06 16:38 UTC. Check CISA ↗

How to respond

  1. Confirm the product, installed package version, and any configuration requirements in the vendor advisory.
  2. Follow the vendor’s remediation or workaround guidance in the references below. Structured fixed-version data is unavailable here; the publisher’s description may include a fix or workaround.
  3. Restart affected services if required, then verify the running version. Known exploitation may warrant investigation as well as patching.

Sources and remediation references

This public advisory does not determine whether a particular server is affected. Records are refreshed as sources change; verify urgent decisions against the original advisory.

← Browse the public CVE feed